def14a
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment
No. )
Filed by the
Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the
Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
|
|
|
o Preliminary
Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o Confidential,
for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
|
þ Definitive
Proxy Statement
|
o Definitive
Additional Materials
|
o Soliciting
Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
|
Lamar Advertising Company
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if
other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
þ |
No fee required.
|
|
o |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act
Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
|
|
|
(1) |
Title of each class of securities to which
transaction applies:
|
|
|
(2) |
Aggregate number of securities to which
transaction applies:
|
|
|
(3) |
Per unit price or other underlying value of
transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11
(set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and
state how it was determined):
|
|
|
(4) |
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
o |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
|
o |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as
provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing
for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the
previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or
Schedule and the date of its filing.
|
|
|
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
|
(2) |
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY
5551 Corporate Boulevard
Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808
(225) 926-1000
NOTICE OF 2005 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 26, 2005
To the Stockholders:
The 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Lamar Advertising
Company, a Delaware corporation, will be held at the offices of
Lamar Advertising Company, 5551 Corporate Boulevard, Baton
Rouge, Louisiana, at 10:00 a.m. on Thursday, May 26,
2005, for the following purposes:
|
|
|
1. To elect seven directors, each for a one-year term. |
|
|
2. To transact any other business as may properly come
before the meeting. |
|
|
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on
April 6, 2005 will be entitled to vote at the meeting. |
It is important that your shares be represented at the
meeting. Therefore, whether or not you plan to attend the
meeting, please complete your proxy and return it in the
enclosed envelope, which requires no postage if mailed in the
United States. If you attend the meeting and wish to vote in
person, your proxy will not be used.
|
|
|
By order of the Board of Directors, |
|
|
James R. McIlwain
|
|
Secretary |
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
April 22, 2005
LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY
PROXY STATEMENT
FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 26, 2005
General Information
This proxy statement is furnished in connection with the
solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of Lamar
Advertising Company for use at the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be held at the offices of Lamar Advertising
Company, 5551 Corporate Boulevard, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, at
10:00 a.m. on Thursday, May 26, 2005, and at any
adjournments of the Annual Meeting.
We are mailing our annual report to stockholders for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2004 to stockholders with the
mailing of this proxy statement on or about April 22, 2005.
Our annual report to stockholders includes a copy of our annual
report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004 as filed with the SEC, except for certain
exhibits.
Record Date, Voting Rights and Outstanding Shares
The Board of Directors has fixed April 6, 2005 as the
record date for determining holders of our common stock who are
entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.
We have two classes of common stock and one class of preferred
stock issued and outstanding: Class A Common Stock, $.001
par value per share, Class B Common Stock, $.001 par value
per share, and Series AA Preferred Stock, $.001 par value
per share. We refer to our Class A Common Stock and our
Class B Common Stock collectively as our common stock.
With respect to the matters submitted for vote at the Annual
Meeting, each share of Class A Common Stock and
Series AA Preferred Stock is entitled to one vote, and each
share of Class B Common Stock is entitled to ten votes.
Our Class A Common Stock, Class B Common Stock and
Series AA Preferred Stock will vote as a single class on
the matters submitted at the Annual Meeting. On April 6,
2005, there were outstanding and entitled to vote 89,849,892
shares of Class A Common Stock, 15,672,527 shares of
Class B Common Stock and 5,719.49 shares of Series AA
Preferred Stock.
The presence at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, of
the holders of one-third of the votes represented by the
Class A Common Stock, the Class B Common Stock and the
Series AA Preferred Stock issued and outstanding on
April 6, 2005 will constitute a quorum for the transaction
of business. Proxies submitted by brokers that do not indicate a
vote for the proposal because the brokers do not have
discretionary voting authority and have not received
instructions from the beneficial owners on how to vote on the
proposal are called broker non-votes. We will count
broker non-votes, votes withheld and abstentions as being
present at the Annual Meeting in determining whether a quorum
exists for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting.
Stockholders who do not attend the Annual Meeting in person may
submit proxy cards by mail. Proxy cards in the enclosed form, if
received in time for voting and are not revoked, will be voted
at the Annual
Meeting in accordance with the instructions on the proxy cards.
If no instructions are indicated, the shares represented by the
proxy will be voted:
|
|
|
|
|
FOR the election of the Director nominees named herein;
and |
|
|
|
In accordance with the judgment of the proxy holders as to any
other matter that may be properly brought before the Annual
Meeting or any adjournments of the Annual Meeting. |
We will not count shares that abstain from voting on a
particular matter or shares represented by broker non-votes as
votes cast on that matter. Accordingly, abstentions and broker
non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of voting on
matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting that require the
affirmative vote of a certain percentage or a plurality of the
votes cast on a matter.
Voting of Proxies
You may vote by either of the following means:
|
|
|
|
|
by mail; or |
|
|
|
in person at the Annual Meeting. |
To vote by mail, sign, date and complete the enclosed proxy card
and return it in the enclosed self-addressed envelope. If you
hold your shares through a bank, broker or other nominee, it
will give you separate instructions for voting your shares.
Revocability of Proxies
Any stockholder giving a proxy has the power to revoke it at any
time before it is exercised. You may revoke the proxy by filing
an instrument of revocation or a duly executed proxy bearing a
later date with our Secretary at our principal executive
offices, 5551 Corporate Boulevard, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808.
You may also revoke your proxy by attending the Annual Meeting
and voting in person. If you do not revoke your proxy, we will
vote the proxy at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the
instructions indicated on your proxy card.
Householding of Annual Meeting Materials
Some banks, brokers and other nominee record holders may be
householding our proxy statements and annual
reports. This means that only one copy of our proxy statement
and annual report to stockholders may have been sent to multiple
stockholders in your household. We will promptly deliver a
separate copy of either document to you if you call
(225-926-1000) or write us at our principal executive offices at
5551 Corporate Boulevard, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808,
Attention: Secretary. If you want to receive separate copies of
the proxy statement or annual report to stockholders in the
future, or if you are receiving multiple copies and would like
to receive only one copy per household, you should contact your
bank, broker or other nominee record holder, or you may contact
us at the above address and telephone number.
2
Share Ownership
The following table sets forth certain information known to us
as of March 15, 2005 with respect to the shares of our
Class A and Class B Common Stock that are beneficially
owned as of such date by: (i) each of our directors and
each of our nominees for director; (ii) our Chief Executive
Officer and each of our other executive officers; (iii) all
of our directors and executive officers as a group; and
(iv) each person known by us to beneficially own more than
5% of our Class A or Class B Common Stock. Except as
otherwise indicated, we believe each beneficial owner named
below has sole voting and sole investment power with respect to
all shares beneficially owned by that holder.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title of |
|
Number of | |
|
Percent | |
Beneficial Owner |
|
Class |
|
Shares Owned | |
|
of Class | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Directors, Nominees for Director and
Executive Officers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin P. Reilly, Jr.
|
|
Class A |
|
|
800,511 |
(1)(2) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
Class B
(3) |
|
|
11,362,250 |
(4)(5) |
|
|
72.5 |
% (6) |
|
Anna Reilly Cullinan
|
|
Class A |
|
|
548,138 |
(1) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
Class B
(3) |
|
|
10,540,280 |
(4)(7) |
|
|
67.3 |
% (8) |
|
John Maxwell Hamilton
|
|
Class A |
|
|
25,000 |
(9) |
|
|
* |
|
|
Keith A. Istre
|
|
Class A |
|
|
96,512 |
(10) |
|
|
* |
|
|
Robert M. Jelenic
|
|
Class A |
|
|
13,734 |
(11) |
|
|
* |
|
|
Charles W. Lamar III
|
|
Class A |
|
|
4,673,885 |
(12) |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
Stephen P. Mumblow
|
|
Class A |
|
|
25,000 |
(13) |
|
|
* |
|
|
Thomas V. Reifenheiser
|
|
Class A |
|
|
24,000 |
(14) |
|
|
* |
|
|
Sean E. Reilly
|
|
Class A |
|
|
655,638 |
(1)(15) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
Class B
(3) |
|
|
10,782,835 |
(4) |
|
|
68.8 |
% (16) |
|
Wendell Reilly
|
|
Class A |
|
|
1,120,523 |
(1)(17) |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
Class B
(3) |
|
|
9,987,162 |
(4)(18) |
|
|
63.7 |
% (19) |
|
All Current Directors and Executive Officers |
|
Class A |
|
|
5,766,142 |
(20) |
|
|
19.3 |
% (21) |
as a group (9 Persons)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5% Stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FMR Corp.
|
|
Class A |
|
|
12,676,910 |
(22) |
|
|
14.1 |
% |
82 Devonshire Street
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boston, MA 02109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goldman Sachs Asset Management, L.P.
|
|
Class A |
|
|
9,106,916 |
(23) |
|
|
10.1 |
% |
32 Old Slip
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York, NY 10005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title of |
|
Number of | |
|
Percent | |
Beneficial Owner |
|
Class |
|
Shares Owned | |
|
of Class | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
5% Stockholders (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Janus Capital Management LLC
|
|
Class A |
|
|
7,902,551 |
(24) |
|
|
8.8 |
% |
151 Detroit Street
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denver, CO 80206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Reilly Family Limited Partnership
|
|
Class A |
|
|
548,138 |
|
|
|
* |
|
c/o Lamar Advertising Company
|
|
Class B
(3) |
|
|
9,000,000 |
|
|
|
57.4 |
% (25) |
5551 Corporate Blvd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baton Rouge, LA 70808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wellington Management Company, LLP
|
|
Class A |
|
|
4,641,515 |
(26) |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
75 State Street
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boston, MA 02109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes 548,138 shares held by the Reilly Family Limited
Partnership (the RFLP), of which Kevin P. Reilly,
Jr. is the managing general partner. Kevin Reillys three
siblings, Anna Reilly Cullinan (a nominee for director), Sean E.
Reilly (the Chief Operating Officer and Vice President) and
Wendell Reilly (a nominee for director) are the other general
partners of the RFLP. The managing general partner has sole
voting power over the shares but dispositions of the shares
require the approval of 50% of the general partnership interests
of the RFLP. Anna Reilly Cullinan, Sean Reilly and Wendell
Reilly disclaim any beneficial ownership in the shares held by
the RFLP. |
|
|
(2) |
Includes 107,500 shares subject to stock options exercisable
within 60 days of March 15, 2005. |
|
|
(3) |
Upon the sale of any shares of Class B Common Stock to a
person other than to a Permitted Transferee, such shares will
automatically convert into shares of Class A Common Stock.
Permitted Transferees include (i) Kevin P. Reilly, Sr.;
(ii) a descendant of Kevin P. Reilly, Sr.; (iii) a
spouse or surviving spouse (even if remarried) of any individual
named or described in (i) or (ii) above; (iv) any
estate, trust, guardianship, custodianship, curatorship or other
fiduciary arrangement for the primary benefit of any one or more
of the individuals named or described in (i), (ii) and
(iii) above; and (v) any corporation, partnership,
limited liability company or other business organization
controlled by and substantially all of the interests in which
are owned, directly or indirectly, by any one or more of the
individuals and entities named or described in (i), (ii),
(iii) and (iv) above. Except for voting rights, the
Class A and Class B Common Stock are substantially
identical. The holders of Class A Common Stock and
Class B Common Stock vote together as a single class
(except as may otherwise be required by Delaware law), with the
holders of Class A Common Stock entitled to one vote per
share and the holders of Class B Common Stock entitled to
ten votes per share, on all matters on which the holders of
common stock are entitled to vote. |
|
|
(4) |
Includes 9,000,000 shares held by the RFLP (see footnote 1
above). |
|
|
(5) |
Includes 377,474 shares held by the Kevin P. Reilly, Jr. Family
Trust. |
|
|
(6) |
Represents 10.8% of the Class A Common Stock if all shares
of Class B Common Stock are converted into Class A
Common Stock. |
|
|
(7) |
Includes 1,540,280 shares owned jointly by Anna Reilly Cullinan
and her spouse. |
|
|
(8) |
Represents 10.0% of the Class A Common Stock if all shares
of Class B Common Stock are converted into Class A
Common Stock. |
4
|
|
|
|
(9) |
Consists of 24,000 shares of Class A Common Stock subject
to stock options exercisable within 60 days of
March 15, 2005, and 1,000 shares owned jointly with his
spouse. |
|
|
(10) |
Includes 95,200 shares of Class A Common Stock subject to
stock options exercisable within 60 days of March 15,
2005. |
|
(11) |
Includes 13,334 shares of Class A Common Stock subject to
stock options exercisable within 60 days of March 15,
2005. |
|
(12) |
Includes (a) 425,000 shares that Charles W. Lamar III has
exchanged for units in exchange funds over which he retains
voting power; (b) 200,000 shares that Charles Lamar has
pledged pursuant to forward sales contracts; (c) 916,924
shares held in trust for Charles Lamars two minor children
who reside with him, of which 300,000 shares have been pledged
pursuant to forward sales contracts, and 70,000 shares have been
exchanged for units in an exchange fund over which they retain
voting power; Charles Lamar disclaims beneficial ownership of
the shares held by the trusts; (d) 2,609,490 shares held by
CWL3, LLC, CWL3 No. 2DG, LLC, CWL3 No. 3C, LLC, and
Lamar Investment Fund, LLC, of which 1,000,000 shares have been
pledged pursuant to forward sales contracts and collars; Charles
Lamar is deemed be the beneficial owner of the shares held by
these entities; and (e) 50,750 shares owned by
Mr. Lamars spouse and 5,710 shares owned by Charles
Lamars minor children, as to which Mr. Lamar disclaims
beneficial ownership. |
|
(13) |
Includes 24,000 shares of Class A Common Stock subject to
stock options exercisable within 60 days of March 15,
2005. |
|
(14) |
Consists of 24,000 shares of Class A Common Stock subject
to stock options exercisable within 60 days of
March 15, 2005. |
|
(15) |
Includes 107,500 shares subject to stock options exercisable
within 60 days of March 15, 2005. |
|
(16) |
Represents 10.2% of the Class A Common Stock if all shares
of Class B Common Stock are converted into Class A
Common Stock. |
|
(17) |
Includes (i) 224,172 shares held in a trust of which
Wendell Reilly is the trustee and (ii) 210,375 shares held
by a limited partnership, the general partner of which is a
single-member limited liability company, the sole member of
which is Mr. Reillys spouse. |
|
(18) |
Includes 200,000 shares held in a trust of which Mr. Reilly
is the trustee. |
|
(19) |
Represents 9.5% of the Class A Common Stock if all shares
of Class B Common Stock are converted into Class A
Common Stock. |
|
(20) |
See Notes 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15. |
|
(21) |
Assumes the conversion of all shares of Class B Common
Stock into shares of Class A Common Stock. |
|
(22) |
Includes (a) 11,161,767 shares beneficially owned by its
wholly owned subsidiary Fidelity Management & Research
Company over which FMR Corp. and Edward C. Johnson 3d have sole
dispositive power, (b) 159,201 shares also owned by
Fidelity Management & Research Company that could be
acquired upon the conversion of $8,200,000 principal amount of
Lamar Advertisings 2.875% Convertible Notes due 2010,
(c) 655,882 shares beneficially owned by Fidelity
Management Trust Company over which FMR Corp. and Edward C.
Johnson 3d have sole voting and dispositive power, (d) 740
shares beneficially owned by Strategic Advisers, Inc. over which
FMR Corp. and Edward C. Johnson 3d have sole voting and
dispositive power, and (e) 699,320 shares owned by Fidelity
International Limited and voluntarily reported as beneficially
owned by FMR Corp. and Edward C. Johnson 3d. Based on the
Schedule 13G/ A filed by FMR Corp. with the Commission for
the year ended December 31, 2004. |
5
|
|
(23) |
Goldman Sachs Asset Management, L.P. has sole voting power as to
7,428,806 of these shares and sole dispositive power as to all
of these shares. Based on the Schedule 13G/ A filed with
the Commission by Goldman Sachs Asset Management, L.P. for the
year ended December 31, 2004. |
|
(24) |
Includes (a) 1,096,082 shares that may be acquired by Janus
Capital Management LLC upon the conversion of bonds and
(b) 631,880 shares beneficially owned by Enhanced
Investment Technologies LLC over which Janus Capital Management
LLC shares voting and investment power. Based on the
Schedule 13G/ A filed with the Commission by Janus Capital
Management LLC for the year ended December 31, 2004. |
|
(25) |
Represents 8.5% of the Class A Common Stock if all shares
of Class B Common Stock are converted into Class A
Common Stock. |
|
(26) |
Wellington Management Company, LLP shares voting power as to
3,274,164 of these shares and shares investment power as to all
of these shares. Based on the Schedule 13G/ A filed by
Wellington Management Company, LLP with the Commission for the
year ended December 31, 2004. |
The Company also has outstanding 5,719.49 shares of
Series AA Preferred Stock. Holders of Series AA
Preferred Stock are entitled to one vote per share. The
Series AA Preferred Stock is held as follows: 3,134.8
shares (54.8%) by the RFLP, of which Kevin P. Reilly, Jr. is the
managing general partner and Anna Reilly Cullinan, Sean E.
Reilly and Wendell Reilly are the general partners; 1,500 shares
(26.2%) by Charles W. Lamar III; and 1,084.69 shares (19.0%) by
Mary Lee Lamar Dixon. The aggregate outstanding Series AA
Preferred Stock represents less than 1% of the capital stock of
the Company.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance
Our directors, our executive officers and anyone owning
beneficially more than ten percent of our registered equity
securities are required under Section 16(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to file with the SEC reports of
their ownership and changes to their ownership of our
securities. They must also furnish copies of the reports to us.
Based solely on our review of the reports furnished to us and
any written representations we received that no other reports
were required, we believe that, during the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004, our officers, directors and ten-percent
stockholders complied with all Section 16(a) filing
requirements applicable to them, except for the following:
Mr. Lamar reported three transactions that occurred on
November 19, 2004 on a Form 4 filed on
December 15, 2004 and Mrs. Cullinan reported one gift
transaction that occurred on June 29, 2004 on a Form 5
filed on April 14, 2005.
6
PROPOSAL: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The Board of Directors has fixed the number of directors at
seven for the coming year. The persons named below have been
nominated for election as directors at the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be held on May 26, 2005, to serve until the
next Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors
are elected and qualified. Each has consented to being named a
nominee in this proxy statement and to serve, if elected, as a
director. If any nominee is unable to serve, proxies will be
voted for such other candidates as may be nominated by the Board
of Directors.
The Board has determined that Messrs. Hamilton, Jelenic,
Mumblow and Reifenheiser are independent directors
as defined in the Nasdaq National Market listing standards.
Required Vote
Directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast by
the stockholders entitled to vote on this proposal at the
meeting. Abstentions, broker non-votes and votes withheld will
not be treated as votes cast for this purpose and will not
affect the outcome of the election.
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the
election
of each of the nominees listed below.
Nominees for Director
The following table contains certain information about the
nominees for director.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director | |
Name and Age |
|
Business Experience During Past Five Years and Other Directorships |
|
Since | |
|
|
|
|
| |
Kevin P. Reilly, Jr.
Age: 50 |
|
Kevin P. Reilly, Jr. has served as our President and Chief
Executive Officer since February 1989 and as one of our
directors since February 1984. Mr. Reilly served as the
President of our Outdoor Division from 1984 to 1989. Mr. Reilly,
our employee since 1978, has also served as Assistant and
General Manager of our Baton Rouge Region and Vice President and
General Manager of the Louisiana Region. Mr. Reilly received a
B.A. from Harvard University in 1977. |
|
|
1984 |
|
|
Anna Reilly Cullinan
Age: 41 |
|
From 1995 until 2000, Mrs. Cullinan owned and operated
Lulas Cafe, a restaurant, and served on the Board of
Directors of several community-based organizations in South
Bend, Indiana. Mrs. Cullinan currently is a director of St.
Joseph Capital Corporation in South Bend. Prior to living and
raising her family in Indiana, Mrs. Cullinan worked for the
Corporation for National Service and the Ashoka Foundation in
Washington, D.C. Mrs. Cullinan received her B.A. from Emory
University in 1985, and a Masters of Public Policy from Duke
University in 1990. |
|
|
2001 |
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director | |
Name and Age |
|
Business Experience During Past Five Years and Other Directorships |
|
Since | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Wendell Reilly
Age: 47 |
|
Wendell Reilly has been the Managing Partner of Grapevine
Partners, LLC, a media and communications investment company,
since 2000. Mr. Reilly is also the Chief Executive Officer of
SignPost Networks, LLC, an advertising company focusing on
electronic displays located in transit centers, and a director
of Leader Publishing Group and Piedmont Television LLC. Mr.
Reilly currently serves as a trustee of Emory University and as
an advisory board member of Hands On Atlanta. Mr. Reilly
previously served as the Companys Chief Financial Officer
from 1985 to 1989 and director from 1999 to 2001, as well as the
Chief Financial Officer of Haas Publishing Companies from 1989
to 1993. Mr. Reilly received a B.A. in English from Emory
University in 1980, and an M.B.A. in Finance from Vanderbilt
University in 1983. |
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen P. Mumblow
Age: 49 |
|
Stephen P. Mumblow is the President of Manhan Media, Inc., an
investment company in broadcasting and other media concerns. Mr.
Mumblow is also a director of the Journal Register Company.
Until January 2002, Mr. Mumblow was the President and a Director
of Communications Corporation of America, a television and radio
broadcasting company, having joined that company in 1998. Mr.
Mumblow was a Managing Director of Chase Securities, Inc., an
investment banking firm, from March 1988 to August 1998. Prior
to that, he was a Vice President of Michigan Energy Resources
Company, an intrastate natural gas utility company and cable
television and broadcasting concern, and Citibank, N.A., a
commercial bank. Mr. Mumblow is a 1977 graduate of The Wharton
School, University of Pennsylvania with a B.S. Degree in
Economics. |
|
|
1999 |
|
|
John Maxwell Hamilton
Age: 58 |
|
John Maxwell Hamilton has served as Dean of the Manship School
of Mass Communications of Louisiana State University since 1992.
In addition, Mr. Hamilton worked on the staff of the World Bank,
the United States House of Representatives Subcommittee on
Economic Policy and Trade, and the United States Agency for
International Development. Mr. Hamilton received a B.A. in
Journalism from Marquette University in 1969, an M.S. in
Journalism from Boston University in 1974 and a Ph.D. from
George Washington University in 1983. |
|
|
2000 |
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director | |
Name and Age |
|
Business Experience During Past Five Years and Other Directorships |
|
Since | |
|
|
|
|
| |
Thomas V. Reifenheiser
Age: 69 |
|
Thomas V. Reifenheiser was a Managing Director and Group
Executive for the Global Media and Telecom Group of Chase
Securities Inc., an investment banking firm, from 1995 to 2000.
He joined Chase in 1963 and was the Global Media and
Telecom Group Executive since 1977. He is a member of the Board
of Directors of Mediacom Communications Corporation, Cablevision
Systems Corporation and F&W Publications Inc. Mr.
Reifenheiser received a B.B.A. from Hofstra University and an
M.B.A. from The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. |
|
|
2000 |
|
|
Robert M. Jelenic
Age: 54 |
|
Robert M. Jelenic has been President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Journal Register Company since 1990, and became Chairman
of the Board in 1997. He was elected as a director of the Audit
Bureau of Circulations in 2003. Admitted to the Ontario
Institute of Chartered Accountants in 1974, Mr. Jelenic
began his business career with Arthur Andersen in Toronto,
Ontario, Canada. Mr. Jelenic has 29 years of senior
management experience in the newspaper industry, including
12 years with the Toronto Sun Publishing Group.
Mr. Jelenic grew up in Sudbury, Ontario and graduated from
Laurentian University in Sudbury, Ontario with an honors
Bachelor of Commerce degree. |
|
|
2004 |
|
Family Relationships
Kevin P. Reilly, Jr., Sean Reilly, our Chief Operating Officer,
and Wendell Reilly, a nominee for director, are brothers, Anna
Reilly Cullinan is their sister, and Charles W. Lamar III is
their cousin.
Board and Committee Meetings
During the year ended December 31, 2004, our Board of
Directors held four meetings. Each of the directors who was then
in office attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of
meetings of our Board and all of its committees on which that
director served. The Board committees currently consist of an
Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating and
Governance Committee. During the year ended December 31,
2004, the Audit Committee held twelve meetings, the Compensation
Committee held three meetings and the Nominating and Governance
Committee held one meeting. We encourage, but do not require,
our board members to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Last year, six of our directors attended the stockholders
meeting.
Meetings in Executive Session. Our independent
directors have regularly scheduled meetings at which only
independent directors are present. During 2004, the independent
directors met in executive session on two occasions.
Audit Committee. The Audit Committee currently
consists of Stephen P. Mumblow (Chairman), Robert M. Jelenic and
Thomas V. Reifenheiser. Mr. Hamilton was a member of the
Committee through May 2004. Our Board of Directors has
determined that each member of the Audit Committee satisfies the
independence and financial literacy requirements as defined by
applicable Nasdaq National Market listing standards governing
the qualifications of Audit Committee members. Stephen P.
Mumblow and Robert M. Jelenic each qualify as an audit
committee financial expert under the rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission
9
and satisfy the financial sophistication requirements under
applicable Nasdaq requirements. The Audit Committee assists our
Board of Directors in fulfilling its responsibility for general
oversight of the integrity of our financial statements,
including compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the
independent registered public accounting firms
qualifications and independence, and the performance of our
internal audit function. The Audit Committee is also responsible
for the appointment and oversight of our independent registered
public accounting firm and our internal auditor. The Audit
Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board
of Directors.
Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee
currently consists of Thomas V. Reifenheiser (Chairman), John
Maxwell Hamilton and Stephen P. Mumblow, each of whom meets the
independence requirements as defined by applicable Nasdaq
National Market listing standards governing the independence of
directors. Mr. Hamilton joined the Committee effective
October 2004. The Committees responsibilities include
evaluating the performance of the Chief Executive Officer and
our other executive officers and reviewing and determining such
officers cash and equity-based compensation and benefits.
Nominating and Governance Committee. The
Nominating and Governance Committee currently consists of Thomas
V. Reifenheiser (Chairman) and Stephen P. Mumblow, each of whom
meets the independence requirements as defined by applicable
Nasdaq National Market listing standards governing the
independence of directors. The Committees responsibilities
include identifying individuals qualified to become Board
members and recommending to the Board the director nominees for
the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders, as well as candidates
to fill vacancies on the Board. Additionally, the Committee
recommends to the Board the directors to be appointed to Board
committees. The Committee also developed and recommended to the
Board a set of corporate governance guidelines and oversees the
effectiveness of our corporate governance in accordance with
those guidelines.
Mr. Wendell Reilly is the only nominee for director
proposed to be elected at the Annual Meeting who is not
currently serving as a director of the Company.
Mr. Reillys name was first suggested by the Chief
Executive Officer. For information relating to the nominations
process, including the nomination of directors by stockholders,
see Director Candidates below. The Nominating and
Governance Committee operates under a written charter adopted by
the Board of Directors.
Committee Charters. You may view copies of the
charters of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and
Nominating and Governance Committee, as currently in effect, on
the corporate governance section of our website, www.lamar.com.
Director Candidates
The process followed by the Nominating and Governance Committee
to identify and evaluate director candidates includes requesting
Board members and others to submit recommendations, meeting from
time to time to evaluate biographical information and background
materials relating to potential candidates and interviewing
(with Board members) selected candidates.
In considering whether to recommend any candidate for inclusion
in the Boards slate of director nominees, the Nominating
and Governance Committee will evaluate the candidate against the
standards and qualifications set out in the Companys
Corporate Governance Guidelines, including, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
the extent to which the candidates skills, experience and
perspective adds to the range of talent appropriate for the
Board and whether such attributes are relevant to our industry; |
|
|
|
the candidates ability to dedicate the time and resources
sufficient for the diligent performance of Board duties; |
10
|
|
|
|
|
whether the candidate meets the independence requirements under
applicable Nasdaq National Market listing standards; and |
|
|
|
the extent to which the candidate holds any position that would
conflict with responsibilities to the Company. |
The Committee believes that the backgrounds and qualifications
of the directors, considered as a group, should provide a
significant composite mix of experience, knowledge and abilities
that will allow the Board to fulfill its responsibilities.
Stockholders may recommend candidates for the Nominating and
Governance Committee to consider as potential director nominees
by submitting names, biographical information and background
materials to the Nominating and Governance Committee, c/o
General Counsel, Lamar Advertising Company, 5551 Corporate
Boulevard, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808. The Nominating and
Governance Committee will consider a recommendation only if
appropriate biographical information and background material is
provided on a timely basis as further described in the
Committees charter. See Board and Committee
Meetings Committee Charters. Assuming that
appropriate biographical and background material is provided for
candidates recommended by stockholders, the Nominating and
Governance Committee will evaluate those candidates by following
substantially the same process, and applying substantially the
same criteria, as for candidates submitted by Board members. The
Committee will also consider whether to nominate any person
nominated by a stockholder in accordance with the provisions of
the Companys bylaws relating to stockholder nominations as
described in Deadline for Stockholder Proposals and
Director Nominations below. To date, no stockholder has
recommended a candidate for director nominee to the Nominating
and Governance Committee or to the Board of Directors.
Communications From Stockholders
The Board will give appropriate attention to written
communications submitted by stockholders, and will respond if
and as appropriate. Absent unusual circumstances or as
contemplated by committee charters, the Chairman of the Audit
Committee will, with the assistance of our General Counsel,
(1) be primarily responsible for monitoring communications
from stockholders and (2) provide copies or summaries of
such communications to the other directors as he considers
appropriate. Communications specifically addressed to a
particular director will be forwarded to that director.
Communications will be forwarded to all directors if they relate
to substantive matters and include suggestions or comments that
the Chairman of the Audit Committee considers to be important
for the directors to know. In general, communications relating
to corporate governance and long-term corporate strategy are
more likely to be forwarded than communications relating to
personal grievances and matters as to which we tend to receive
repetitive or duplicative communications.
Stockholders who wish to send communications on any topic to the
Board should address such communications to the Chairman of the
Audit Committee, c/o General Counsel, Lamar Advertising Company,
5551 Corporate Boulevard, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808.
Director Compensation
From January 1 to September 30, 2004, the Company paid
non-management directors a monthly fee of $1,500. Effective
October 1, 2004, the Company increased this monthly fee to
$3,000. The Company also reimburses non-management directors for
travel expenses incurred to attend board and committee meetings
and expenses incurred to perform other, related responsibilities.
11
For 2004, the Company also paid each member of a committee of
the Board of Directors an annual fee of $9,000, paid quarterly.
The Chairman of the Audit Committee received an additional
annual fee of $9,000, paid quarterly. Effective October 1,
2004, the Company instituted an annual fee of $4,500 to be paid
to the director who serves as the Chair of the Compensation
Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee.
At the discretion of our Compensation Committee, our
independent, non-management directors also receive option grants
from time to time. During 2004, the Company granted the
following options to its non-management directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. of Shares | |
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
Subject to Option | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
Date of Grant | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
John Maxwell Hamilton
|
|
|
10,000(1 |
) |
|
$ |
37.35 |
|
|
|
2/06/2004 |
|
Stephen P. Mumblow
|
|
|
10,000(1 |
) |
|
$ |
37.35 |
|
|
|
2/06/2004 |
|
Thomas V. Reifenheiser
|
|
|
10,000(1 |
) |
|
$ |
37.35 |
|
|
|
2/06/2004 |
|
Robert Jelenic
|
|
|
20,000(2 |
) |
|
$ |
39.62 |
|
|
|
2/26/2004 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Such options became exercisable as to 2,000 shares on the date
of grant, and the remaining options become exercisable as to
2,000 shares on each subsequent anniversary of the date of grant. |
|
(2) |
Such options became exercisable as to 6,667 shares on the date
of grant, and the remaining options become exercisable as to
6,667 shares on the first anniversary of the date of grant and
6,666 shares on the second anniversary of the date of grant. |
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Effective July 1, 1996, the Lamar Texas Limited
Partnership, our subsidiary, and Reilly Consulting Company,
L.L.C., which Kevin P. Reilly, Sr. controls, entered into a
consulting agreement, that was amended effective January 1,
2004. This consulting agreement, as amended, has a term through
December 31, 2008 with automatic renewals for successive
one year periods after that date unless either party provides
written notice of termination to the other. The amended
agreement provides for an annual consulting fee of $190,000 for
the five year period commencing on January 1, 2004 and an
annual consulting fee of $150,000 for any subsequent one year
renewal terms. The agreement also contains a non-disclosure
provision and a non-competition restriction that extends for two
years beyond the termination of the agreement.
We also have a lease arrangement with Deanna Enterprises, LLC
(formerly Reilly Enterprises, LLC), which Kevin P. Reilly, Sr.
controls, for the use of an airplane from the period beginning
October 1, 2001 and continuing for sixty consecutive
months. The arrangement originally provided that we pay a fee of
$5,000 per month plus expenses that entitled us to 6.67 hours of
flight time, any unused portion of which was carried over into
the next succeeding month. In October 2004 we amended this
arrangement, which now provides that we will pay $100,000 per
year for 125 hours of guaranteed flight time. We accrued
approximately $70,000 in total fees under these arrangement for
fiscal 2004.
Kevin P. Reilly, Sr. is the father of Kevin P. Reilly, Jr., Sean
Reilly, Anna Reilly Cullinan and Wendell Reilly. Kevin P.
Reilly, Jr. is our President, Chief Executive Officer and one of
our directors, Sean Reilly is our Chief Operating Officer and
Anna Reilly Cullinan is one of our directors. Wendell Reilly is
a nominee for director, as are Kevin P. Reilly, Jr. and Anna
Reilly Cullinan.
12
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation
The Compensation Committee currently consists of Thomas V.
Reifenheiser (Chairman), John Maxwell Hamilton and Stephen P.
Mumblow. None of our executive officers serves as a member of
the board of directors or compensation committee of any other
company that has one or more executive officers serving as a
member of our Board of Directors or Compensation Committee.
Executive Compensation
|
|
|
Summary Compensation Table |
The following table sets forth certain compensation information
for our Chief Executive Officer and each of our other executive
officers whose salary and bonus for the year ended
December 31, 2004 exceeded $100,000, which are herein
referred to as the Named Executive Officers.
Summary Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation Awards | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation | |
|
Shares of Class A | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Common Stock | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Annual | |
|
Underlying | |
|
All Other | |
Name and Principal Position |
|
Year | |
|
Salary ($) | |
|
Bonus ($) | |
|
Compensation ($) | |
|
Options (#) | |
|
Compensation ($) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Kevin P. Reilly, Jr.
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
550,000 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
62,549(1 |
) |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
64,747(2 |
) |
|
President and
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
220,000 |
|
|
|
425,000 |
|
|
|
77,298(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,854(2 |
) |
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
220,000 |
|
|
|
175,000 |
|
|
|
37,921(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,316(2 |
) |
|
Sean E. Reilly
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
425,000 |
|
|
|
175,000 |
|
|
|
64,832(3 |
) |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
50,000(4 |
) |
|
Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
190,000 |
|
|
|
325,000 |
|
|
|
35,231(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000(4 |
) |
|
and Vice President
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
190,000 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
12,533(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000(4 |
) |
|
Keith A. Istre
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
425,000 |
|
|
|
175,000 |
|
|
|
12,314(5 |
) |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
50,000(4 |
) |
|
Treasurer and
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
325,000 |
|
|
|
9,883(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000(4 |
) |
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
166,000 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
18,250(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000(4 |
) |
|
|
(1) |
Consists of (a) $13,286, $5,317, and $22,651 in 2004, 2003, and
2002, respectively, for the personal use of a Company car, (b)
$46,763, $69,481, and $12,870 in 2004, 2003, and 2002,
respectively, for the personal use of Company aircraft, and (c)
$2,500, $2,500, and $2,500 in 2004, 2003, and 2002,
respectively, for Company-paid health insurance premiums and
medical reimbursements. The incremental cost to the Company of
an executives personal use of Company aircraft is
calculated based on the variable operating costs to the Company,
including fuel costs, landing/ramp fees and trip-related
maintenance. Fixed costs that do not change based on usage, such
as pilot salaries and the cost of maintenance not related to
trips, are excluded. The amounts reported reflect a change in
methodology from prior years in which the cost of personal use
of Company aircraft had been calculated using the Standard
Industrial Fare Level (SIFL) tables found in tax
regulations. |
|
(2) |
Consists of (a) employer contributions under the
Companys deferred compensation plan of $57,500 per year,
(b) $7,247, $7,642, and $6,667 for 2004, 2003 and 2002,
respectively, for the premiums attributable to the term life
insurance portion of two life insurance policies and
(c) $44,712 and $50,149 for 2003 and 2002, respectively,
which is the dollar value, on a term loan approach, of the
benefit of the whole-life portion of the premiums for the life
insurance policies paid by us. Ownership of these insurance
policies was transferred from The Kevin Reilly, Jr. Life
Insurance Trust, a trust for the benefit of
Mr. Reillys children, to us in December 2003. We
terminated one of these policies in 2003 and were reimbursed all
premiums previously paid by us under the policy. The Kevin
Reilly, Jr. Life Insurance Trust remains the primary beneficiary
under the remaining policy, except to the extent of premiums
paid by us. |
|
(3) |
Consists of (a) $8,044, $7,551, and $10,033 in 2004, 2003, and
2002, respectively, for the personal use of Company car, (b)
$54,288 in 2004 and $25,180 in 2003 for the personal use of a
Company aircraft (please refer to footnote 1 |
13
|
|
|
above for a description of how
personal use of a Company aircraft is valued), and (c) $2,500,
$2,500, and $2,500 in 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively, for
Company-paid health insurance premiums and medical
reimbursements.
|
|
(4) |
The reported amounts consist of
employer contributions under the Companys deferred
compensation plan.
|
|
(5) |
Consists of (a) $9,814, $7,383, and
$15,750 in 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively, for the personal
use of a Company car and (b) $2,500, $2,500, and $2,500 in 2004,
2003, and 2002, respectively, for Company-paid health insurance
premiums and medical reimbursements.
|
|
|
|
Option Grants and Potential Realizable Values Table |
The following table sets forth certain information concerning
option grants made to the Named Executive Officers during fiscal
year 2004.
Option Grants In Last Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential Realizable | |
|
|
Individual Grants | |
|
Value at Assumed | |
|
|
| |
|
Annual Rates of Stock | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Percent of Total | |
|
|
|
Price Appreciation for | |
|
|
Securities | |
|
Options Granted | |
|
|
|
Option Term(2) | |
|
|
Underlying Options | |
|
To Employees In | |
|
Exercise or Base | |
|
Expiration | |
|
| |
Name |
|
Granted (#) | |
|
Fiscal Year (%) | |
|
Price ($/Sh) | |
|
Date | |
|
5% ($) | |
|
10% ($) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Kevin P. Reilly, Jr.
|
|
|
25,000 |
(1) |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
37.35 |
|
|
|
2/06/14 |
|
|
|
587,230 |
|
|
|
1,488,157 |
|
Sean E. Reilly
|
|
|
25,000 |
(1) |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
37.35 |
|
|
|
2/06/14 |
|
|
|
587,230 |
|
|
|
1,488,157 |
|
Keith A. Istre
|
|
|
25,000 |
(1) |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
37.35 |
|
|
|
2/06/14 |
|
|
|
587,230 |
|
|
|
1,488,157 |
|
|
|
(1) |
This option became exercisable as to 5,000 shares on
February 6, 2004 and an additional 5,000 shares
February 6, 2005. The remainder of this option will become
exercisable as to 5,000 shares on each of February 6, 2006,
2007 and 2008. |
|
(2) |
The values in this column are given for illustrative purposes;
they do not reflect the Companys estimate or projection of
future stock prices. The values are based on an assumption that
the Companys Class A Common Stocks market price
will appreciate at the stated rate, compounded annually, from
the date of the option grant until the end of the options
10-year term. Actual gains, if any, on stock option exercises
will depend upon the future performance of the Companys
Class A Common Stock, which will benefit all stockholders
proportionately. |
|
|
|
Option Exercises and Year-End Values Table |
The following table sets forth certain information concerning
exercisable and unexercisable stock options held by the Named
Executive Officers as of December 31, 2004.
Aggregated Option Exercises In Last Fiscal Year And
Fiscal Year-End Option Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying Unexercised |
|
Value of Unexercised in-the- | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options at Fiscal |
|
Money Options at Fiscal | |
|
|
Shares Acquired | |
|
|
|
Year-End (#) |
|
Year-End ($) | |
Name |
|
On Exercise (#) | |
|
Value Realized ($) | |
|
Exercisable/Unexercisable |
|
Exercisable/Unexercisable(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Kevin P. Reilly, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,500/20,000 |
|
|
$1,622,250/$108,600 |
|
Sean E. Reilly
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,500/20,000 |
|
|
$1,622,250/$108,600 |
|
Keith A. Istre
|
|
|
57,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,043,873 |
|
|
90,200/20,000 |
|
|
$1,374,322/$108,600 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Based on the difference between the option exercise price and
the closing price of the underlying Class A Common Stock on
December 31, 2004. The closing price on that date was
$42.78. |
14
|
|
|
Compensation Committee Report on Executive
Compensation |
Our executive compensation policy is designed to attract, retain
and reward executive officers who contribute to our long-term
success by maintaining a competitive salary structure and
aligning individual compensation with the achievement of
corporate and individual performance objectives. The
Compensation Committee makes decisions each year regarding
executive compensation. The Companys cash compensation
package for executive officers consists of base salary and
annual bonuses. The Company also provides equity incentive
grants to its executives as a means to drive long-term
performance. This report is submitted by the Compensation
Committee and addresses the compensation policies for fiscal
year 2004 as they affected each of our executive officers.
|
|
|
Executive Officer Compensation |
The Committee has determined that executive officer base
salaries and cash bonuses should be based on industry averages
for comparable positions as well as on individual and corporate
performance.
Base Salary. For 2004, the Chief Executive Officer made
recommendations to the Committee as to base salary amounts for
each executive officer (including himself) based on his
assessment of each officers individual performance and
current level of compensation. This recommendation also took
into account the total compensation paid in 2003, which included
a one-time bonus adjustment to achieve total cash compensation
that was comparable to a media industry peer group, and the
intention to realign total compensation so that base salary
represents approximately 60 to 70% of total compensation. The
Committee evaluated the Chief Executive Officers
recommendations, taking into account the officers tenure
in his position, the Committees subjective assessment of
individual performance and our overall performance during the
prior year. The Committee did not apply a strict formula but
instead considered these factors together without giving any
specific weight to any individual factor. The Committee gauged
our overall performance based on several key indicators. These
indicators included the number of acquisitions completed and the
aggregate purchase price thereof, the market performance of our
Class A Common Stock and the growth in net revenues and
cash flows. The Committee also considered the current financial
and economic environment in making its assessment. The Chief
Executive Officer recommended that for fiscal 2004 his base
salary be set at $550,000 and that the 2004 base salary for each
of the Chief Operating Officer and the Chief Financial Officer
be set at $425,000. The Committee approved these recommendations.
Annual Bonuses. After the completion of each fiscal year,
the Chief Executive Officer proposes to the Committee the size
of annual bonuses, taking into account our growth for that year
and each officers individual performance. In 2004, the
Committee approved a cash bonus of $300,000 to the Chief
Executive Officer and a cash bonus of $175,000 to each of the
Chief Operating Officer and the Chief Financial Officer. The
Chief Executive Officers bonus was also based on our
overall financial performance during 2004.
Deferred Compensation. The Company maintains a
nonqualified deferred compensation plan. Employees are eligible
to participate in the plan if they are designated by the Chief
Executive Officer as participants after satisfying certain age,
years of service, and management classification requirements.
The Company makes annual contributions under the plan for
non-executive officers according to guidelines established by
the Chief Executive Officer, which may vary from time to time.
The Committee reviews and approves the amounts to be contributed
to the Companys executive officers, including the Chief
Executive Officer. Such contributions are held in a rabbi trust
and invested in certain mutual funds. Earnings and losses are
credited on such contributions based upon the investment
returns. A participants right to receive benefits under
the plan is conditioned upon the satisfaction of certain
noncompetition, nonsolicitation, and non-hire covenants. Our
executive officers (including the Chief Executive Officer) are
eligible to receive benefits under this plan.
15
In fiscal year 2004, the Company contributed $57,500 on behalf
of the Chief Executive Officer, $50,000 on behalf of the Chief
Operating Officer and $50,000 on behalf of the Chief Financial
Officer.
Stock Options. Executive officer compensation also
includes awards of options to purchase Class A Common
Stock. The purpose of the equity incentive program is to provide
incentives to the Companys executive officers to manage
with a view toward maximizing long-term shareholder value. In
February 2004, the Committee reviewed recommendations from the
Chief Executive Officer with respect to equity grants for
executive officers and approved option grants of 25,000 shares
to each of the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Operating
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, as shown in the Option
Grants in Last Fiscal Year Table.
|
|
|
Deduction Limit for Executive Compensation |
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code denies a tax
deduction to a public corporation for annual compensation in
excess of one million dollars paid to its Chief Executive
Officer and its four other most highly compensated officers.
This provision excludes certain types of performance-based
compensation from the compensation subject to this limit.
The Committee does not expect to pay any one covered employee
salary and bonus for 2005 that could exceed $1,000,000. In
addition, the 1996 Equity Incentive Plan contains an individual
annual limit on the number of stock options and stock
appreciation rights that may be granted under the plan so that
such awards should qualify for the exclusion from the limitation
on deductibility for performance-based compensation. The plan
also contains shareholder-approved general business criteria so
that the Committee may grant other forms of equity compensation
(such as performance shares) that should be fully deductible.
The Committee believes, however, that in some circumstances
factors other than tax deductibility are more important in
determining the forms and levels of executive compensation most
appropriate and in the best interests of the Company and its
shareholders. Given our industry and business, as well as the
competitive market for outstanding executives, we believe that
it is important for the Committee to retain the flexibility to
design compensation programs consistent with its executive
compensation philosophy for the Company, even if some executive
compensation is not fully deductible. Accordingly, the Committee
may from time to time approve elements of compensation for
certain executives that are not fully deductible.
|
|
|
By the Compensation Committee, |
|
|
Thomas V. Reifenheiser (Chair) |
|
John Maxwell Hamilton |
|
Stephen P. Mumblow |
16
The following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total
stockholder returns on the Class A Common Stock over the
period from December 31, 1999 to December 31, 2004 as
compared with the returns of the Nasdaq US Index and Clear
Channel Communications, Inc., a company that operates outdoor
advertising properties as well as other media properties as part
of its business. The graph below depicts a $100 investment on
December 31, 1999 in our Class A Common Stock, the
Nasdaq US Index and Clear Channel Communications, Inc. with all
dividends, if any, being reinvested.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31-Dec-99 | |
|
31-Dec-00 | |
|
31-Dec-01 | |
|
31-Dec-02 | |
|
31-Dec-03 | |
|
31-Dec-04 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Lamar Advertising Company
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
$ |
70 |
|
|
$ |
56 |
|
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
$ |
71 |
|
Nasdaq US
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
Clear Channel Communications, Inc.
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
$ |
57 |
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
Source: Georgeson Shareholder Communications Inc.
17
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information as of December 31,
2004 with respect to shares of our Class A Common Stock
that may be issued under our existing compensation plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Number of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
securities remaining | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
available for future | |
|
|
(a) Number of securities to | |
|
(b) Weighted-average | |
|
issuance under equity | |
|
|
be issued upon exercise of | |
|
exercise price of | |
|
compensation plans | |
|
|
outstanding options, | |
|
outstanding options, | |
|
(excluding securities | |
Plan Category |
|
warrants and rights | |
|
warrants and rights | |
|
reflected in column (a)) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Equity compensation plans approved by security
holders(1)
|
|
|
4,347,267 |
(2) |
|
$ |
31.01 |
|
|
|
2,555,264 |
(3)(4) |
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,347,267 |
|
|
$ |
31.01 |
|
|
|
2,555,264 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Consists of the 1996 Equity Incentive Plan and 2000 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan. |
|
(2) |
Does not include purchase rights accruing under the 2000
Employee Stock Purchase Plan because the purchase price (and
therefore the number of shares to be purchased) will not be
determined until the end of the purchase period. |
|
(3) |
Includes shares available for future issuance under the 2000
Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Under the evergreen formula of
this plan, on the first day of each fiscal year beginning with
2001, the aggregate number of shares that may be purchased
through the exercise of rights granted under the plan is
increased by the lesser of (a) 500,000 shares,
(b) one-tenth of one percent of the total number of shares
of Class A Common Stock outstanding on the last day of the
preceding fiscal year, and (c) a lesser amount determined
by the board of directors. Pursuant to the evergreen formula, as
of December 31, 2004, a total of 424,022 shares have been
added to the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. |
|
(4) |
In addition to stock option awards, the 1996 Equity Incentive
Plan provides for the issuance of restricted stock, unrestricted
stock and stock appreciation rights. |
Report of the Audit Committee
The following is the report of the Audit Committee with respect
to Lamars audited financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2004.
The purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board in
fulfilling its responsibility to oversee Lamars accounting
and financial reporting, internal controls and audit functions.
The Audit Committee Charter describes in greater detail the full
responsibilities of the committee. The charter was included in
the proxy statement related to Lamars 2004 Annual Meeting.
The Audit Committee is comprised entirely of independent
directors as defined by applicable Nasdaq National Market
listing standards.
Management is responsible for our internal controls and the
financial reporting process. The Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm is responsible for performing an independent
audit of our consolidated financial statements and internal
control over financial reporting in accordance with the
standards established by the Public Company Accounting and
Oversight Board (United States) and issuing a report thereon.
The Committees responsibility is to monitor these
processes. The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the
consolidated financial statements with management and KPMG LLP,
our independent registered public accounting firm.
18
In the course of its oversight of Lamars financial
reporting process, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors
has:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed and discussed with management Lamars audited
financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2004; |
|
|
|
discussed with KPMG LLP, Lamars independent registered
public accounting firm, the matters required to be discussed by
Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, Communication
with Audit Committees; |
|
|
|
received the written disclosures and the letter from KPMG LLP
required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1,
Independence Discussions with Audit Committees; |
|
|
|
discussed with KPMG LLP its independence; and |
|
|
|
considered whether the provision of non-audit services by KPMG
LLP is compatible with maintaining its independence. |
Based on the foregoing review and discussions, the Committee
recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial
statements be included in Lamars annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 for
filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
|
|
|
By the Audit Committee, |
|
|
Stephen P. Mumblow (Chair) |
|
Robert M. Jelenic |
|
Thomas V. Reifenheiser |
Information Concerning Auditors
The firm of KPMG LLP, independent registered public accounting
firm, audited our financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2004. The Audit Committee has appointed KPMG
LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting
firm for its fiscal year ending December 31, 2005.
Representatives of KPMG LLP are expected to attend the Annual
Meeting to respond to appropriate questions, and will have the
opportunity to make a statement if they desire.
The Audit Committee approves the engagement of the independent
registered public accounting firm and approves, in advance, all
audit services and all permitted non-audit services to be
provided to us by the independent registered public accounting
firm.
The fees for services provided by KPMG LLP to the Company in
2004 and 2003 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2004 | |
|
Fiscal 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Audit
Fees(1)
|
|
$ |
893,500 |
|
|
$ |
549,500 |
|
Audit Related Fees
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
Fees(2)
|
|
|
63,666 |
|
|
|
42,923 |
|
All Other Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
972,166 |
|
|
$ |
592,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Audit Fees for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively, were for professional services rendered for the
audits of our consolidated financial statements and review of
financial statements |
19
|
|
|
included in our quarterly and annual financial statements and
statutory and subsidiary audits, issuance of comfort letters,
consents, income tax provision procedures, and assistance with
review of documents filed with the SEC. Audit fees for the year
ended December 31, 2004 also include costs associated with
KPMG LLPs audit of managements assessment of our
internal control over financial reporting and KPMGs own
audit of our internal control over financial reporting. |
|
(2) |
Tax Fees as of the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively, included tax compliance fees of $ 18,675 and
$16,200, and tax planning fees of $ 44,991 and $26,723. |
Other Matters
The Board of Directors is unaware of any business to be
conducted at the Annual Meeting other than the matter described
in the Notice to Stockholders. If other business is properly
presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting, the enclosed
proxy card authorizes the persons named therein to vote the
shares in their discretion on that matter.
Deadline For Stockholder Proposals and Director
Nominations
In order for a stockholder proposal to be considered for
inclusion in our proxy materials for the 2006 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, we must receive it no later than December 23,
2005 at the following address: 5551 Corporate Boulevard, Baton
Rouge, Louisiana 70808, Attention: Secretary.
In addition, our bylaws require a stockholder who wishes to
bring business before an annual meeting or propose director
nominations at an annual meeting to give advance written notice
to the Secretary as described in the bylaws. To be timely for
the 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, proposals must be
received by not later than the close of business on
March 12, 2006.
Expenses Of Solicitation
We will bear the cost of the solicitation of proxies, including
the charges and expenses of brokerage firms and others of
forwarding solicitation material to beneficial owners of common
stock. In addition to the use of mails, proxies may be solicited
by our officers and any regular employees in person or by
telephone. We expect that the costs incurred in the solicitation
of proxies will be nominal.
April 22, 2005
20
(FRONT OF PROXY CARD)
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS IS SOLICITING THIS PROXY
IN CONNECTION WITH THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF
LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY
MAY 26, 2005
Each undersigned stockholder of Lamar Advertising Company (the Company) hereby appoints
Kevin P. Reilly, Jr. and Keith A. Istre, and each of them acting singly, with full power of
substitution, as Proxies to vote on behalf of the undersigned all shares of capital stock of the
Company that the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the
Company to be held on May 26, 2005, and at all adjournments of the Annual Meeting. The undersigned
hereby revokes any proxy previously given with respect to such shares.
This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed by the undersigned
stockholder(s). If no specifications are made, the Proxies named above will vote the shares to
which this Proxy Card relates FOR the proposal listed on the reverse side of this Proxy Card.
THE PROXIES ARE AUTHORIZED TO VOTE IN THEIR DISCRETION ON ANY OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY COMING BEFORE
THE MEETING.
(Continued and to be signed on reverse side)
(REVERSE OF PROXY CARD)
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF
LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY
MAY 26, 2005
Please date, sign and mail your proxy card in the envelope provided as soon as possible.
THE DIRECTORS RECOMMEND A VOTE FOR ALL NOMINEES IN THE PROPOSAL. PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN
PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTE IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS SHOWN HERE: [X]
1. Election of directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOMINEES: |
[ ]
|
|
FOR ALL NOMINEES
|
|
o
|
|
Anna Reilly Cullinan |
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
John Maxwell Hamilton |
[ ]
|
|
WITHHOLD AUTHORITY FOR ALL NOMINEES
|
|
o
|
|
Robert M. Jelenic |
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Stephen P. Mumblow |
[ ]
|
|
FOR ALL EXCEPT
|
|
o
|
|
Thomas V. Reifenheiser |
|
|
(See instructions below)
|
|
o
|
|
Kevin P. Reilly, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Wendell Reilly |
|
|
|
INSTRUCTION:
|
|
To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark FOR ALL EXCEPT and
fill in the circle next to each nominee for whom you wish to
withhold, as shown here: |
To change the address on your account, please check the box at right and indicate your new address
in the address space above. Please note that changes to the registered name(s) on the account may
not be submitted via this method.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature of Stockholder:
|
|
|
|
Date: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature of Stockholder:
|
|
|
|
Date: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note:
|
|
Please sign exactly as your name appears on this Proxy.
When shares are held jointly, each holder should sign.
When signing as executor, administrator, attorney,
trustee or guardian, please give full title as such.
If the signer is a corporation, please sign in full
corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving full
title as such. If the signer is a partnership, please
sign in partnership name by authorized person. |